The Promised Land Act (Master Bill)
Category: Vision — Vision
Summary
A comprehensive vision for BCs future combining reconciliation, sustainability, prosperity, and democratic renewal.
What this proposal changes
- Establishes BC's long-term vision framework across six pillars: Reconciliation, Sustainability, Shared Prosperity, Democratic Renewal, Wellbeing, and Innovation.
- Creates a BC Long-Term Vision Council — with Indigenous, youth, civil society, and expert representation — to produce a 25-year BC strategic plan updated every five years.
- Legislates intergenerational equity as a consideration in all provincial budget decisions, requiring long-term impact assessments for major fiscal commitments.
- Consolidates the goals of the 40 preceding proposals into a unified provincial long-range strategic framework.
Arguments for
- BC currently has no legislated long-term strategic framework; government planning rarely extends beyond four-year electoral cycles.
- A 25-year plan with intergenerational equity requirements creates a durable policy anchor that survives changes of government.
- Representation of youth and future-focused voices addresses the democratic deficit in which current voters make decisions that most affect future generations.
Arguments against
- Long-term vision frameworks are frequently aspirational documents that have little practical effect on government decision-making without binding implementation mechanisms.
- A council with broad representation may produce lowest-common-denominator recommendations rather than the bold policy choices needed to achieve the vision.
- Intergenerational impact assessments add complexity and time to budget processes without guaranteed influence on outcomes.
Cost & implementation
Long-Term Vision Council: $5–10 million annually. Long-term strategic plan development: $2–5 million per five-year cycle. Impact assessment infrastructure: $10–20 million initial setup. No direct program spending — enables and frames other investments.
Jurisdiction & legal authority
Fully within provincial jurisdiction. The Vision Council would be a provincial body; its recommendations would be non-binding unless enacted through specific legislation. Federal coordination required on shared-jurisdiction pillars.
How to vote
Visit cascadia.vote/questions/pnwc-A41 to cast your vote: Yes, No, or Maybe.
See all consultation questions · View results
This platform requires JavaScript for full interactivity. Please enable JavaScript or visit cascadia.vote in a modern browser.